Pursue PEACE

Text: Hebrews 12:14-16        “Running the Christian Race”

Subject: Why should Christians pursue peace with all men?

Complement: So that no root of bitterness springing up causes trouble and by [it?]1 many be defiled2.

Exegetical Idea: Christians should pursue peace with all men so that no root of bitterness springing up causes trouble and by him [this one] many be defiled.

Purpose: As a result of this sermon, my listeners will be convinced that we are to run the Christian race as a team; and that we are to encourage one another and seek the well  being fellow Christians, lest any of us fall short of God’s grace.

 

Homiletical Idea: The Christian race is individual, but the prize is won by team work.

Mood: Sober encouragement.

Hebrews 12:14-16

14Eivrh,nhn diw,kete meta. pa,ntwn1 kai. to.n a`giasmo,n( ou- cwri.j ouvdei.j o;yetai to.n ku,rion(  evpiskopou/ntej mh, tij u`sterw/n avpo. th/j ca,ritoj tou/ qeou/( mh, tij r`i,za pikri,aj a;nw fu,ousa evnoclh/| kai. diV auvth/j mianqw/sin polloi,( mh, tij po,rnoj h’ be,bhloj w`j VHsau/( o]j avnti. brw,sewj mia/j avpe,deto ta. prwtoto,kia e`autou/  

 

My Translation: Pursue [together] with all men salvation2 and the sanctification without which no one will see the Lord; watching that no root of bitterness springing up should trouble and by this many should be defiled, lest there be no immoral or godless person like Esau, who sold his birthright in place of a single meal.

 

Introduction: Have you ever noticed that when athletes compete as a team in a relay race, they do not run at the same speed? Though these athletes are champions in the various states, cities, schools they represent; yet some run at a faster speed than the others in the team. But the remarkable thing is that if the team wins the race, it is not won by individual talents alone. Instead, it is won by a collective effort of the team. So despite the fact that these athletes run at different speeds, they only way they can win the trophy is team effort. Although the race is individual, but as a team victory comes by team work.    

                                                                                   

1.  Eivrh,nhn diw,kete meta. pa,ntwn is the first phrase and the central statement of this passage. The NIV broke the entire passage into several sentences. The NASB separated vs. 14 from the rest of the passage, thereby eliminating the subordinate relationships and created two imperatives statements-pursue and see to it. However, the author connected the pursuit of peace and sanctification with three adverbial qualifiers- excluding individual adverbial modifiers to each, for example  “with all men,” and “without which.” It is fitting to argue that to the author, pursuing peace and sanctification is the positive side of ensuring that none of the believers,  A. Falls short of the grace of God B. Allows a root of bitterness lest it should trouble and defile, and C. acts like Esau by discarding his divine inheritance to satisfy fleshy desire.  

Eivrh,nhn “peace” robs translators and modern preachers the wrong way and has led many to assume that the passage is about pursuing a harmonious relationship that are hampered by the resentment among Christians. To make the matter worse is the fact NIV translations reads make every effort to live in peace with all men. Taking the passage literally, it could mean that, but when one considers that the immediate context 12:14-16, and larger context of Hebrews 12:1-29, the word peace takes a different nuance.  

2. In the OT peace- ~Alv’ generally speaks of well being such as health and prosperity, which comes gift as a from YHWH. Among the prophets, peace becomes eschatological image of Yahweh’s plan for his people. Hence in Isaiah’s later vision, he  sees peace in a spiritual sense, salvation from sin and restoration of all things, see Gerhard Von Rad, Vol. II Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, X vols., gen. ed. Gerhard kittle, trans. Geoffrey Bromiley ; (1964 rpt. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1993) pp 405-406. In addition to the usage of peace in the OT, the most significant use of peace

This concept is true for athletes, but isn’t it also true with regard to running the Christian race? Isn’t it true that although the Christian race is individual, yet we still need the solidarity of fellow brothers and sisters in the body to run and win the race?

 

This is what the writer of the book of Hebrews was saying to his audience, who were faced with uncertainties of their newly found faith.3 And is saying to you and I today.

 

[Example] when we accepted newly Christ into our lives, it was a great experience. We were eager to do anything in the church. We attended every service, helped out in the church, gave of our resources to the church, led souls to Christ. We could not say no to any fellow believer who was in need. But then as the years go by, we begin to realize that Christians are not really perfect people. We are full of flaws, the church is not perfect, the pastor is human and can make mistake, we face the same hardship that non Christians face, the frustration of the lure to go back to the old life sets in. When this happens, you need the encouragement of those who have run the race much longer to carry on, or else you could fall back to the old life.

 

In Hebrews 12, The Holy Spirit is admonishing the believers through the great cloud  of witnesses from the preceding chapter, who have suffered all things to win the prize, not to loose heart in their war against sin and in the race which is set before them. If God allows hardship, they are to understand it as the discipline of the Lord, a sure proof of real son ship. They must know that, while no discipline is pleasant, if it allowed to do its work, it will result in righteousness. The believers must therefore strengthen themselves in their weaknesses, lest the disjointed  limb be torn out of joint. They should instead let it be healed. Hence they must pursue peace and sanctification. This peace becomes the ultimate salvation which comes at the end of a life -long spiritual marathon, and the believers are to pursue it together4 with all, and not to allow some among them to fall short, or to become roots of bitterness5, or to act like Esau. This pursuit of peace with all men is not a pursuit of social harmonious relationship with another believer, but in the context of salvation and sanctification6.

(Homiletical idea): He admonishes believers to run the Christian race as a team. Some may fall away due to trials. If they fall away, they will become roots of bitterness and contaminate other members of the body. The writer does not want this to happen because, If they fall away, they may not be forgiven.       

 

The believers are being admonished to  collectively run the Christian race.

 

TRANSITION: In Hebrews 12, the Holy Spirit encourages the converts from Judaism to Christianity to persevere through trials in their new found faith in Christ. They are encouraged to pursue their salvation and sanctification collectively as a team, so that no one is left behind. (Homiletical Idea):He admonishes the Hebrew Christians to encourage each other and be there for each other so that they could win the race as one body. This passage is tells you and I that we are not lone rangers. We have to work as team. We have to ensure that no one named among us falls short of the grace of God. Even though the race is individual, we can only win as a team.  We have been admonished, and this comes to us through the Hebrew Christians.

                                                                                                                                                                                               

 in the NT to reference the salvation that is created by the Messiah. Peace then becomes the end time salvation of the prophets made real in the person of Jesus and made available to those who repent and believe  (I am indebted to my college professor, Andrew Sargent, PhD, for this insight during a class lecture many years ago). This concept of peace as eschatological salvation and the admonition to pursue it collectively lest anyone named among believers fall short of the grace of God becomes the interpretive framework for this passage as we shall see.

3.                     His audience were newly Christian converts from Judaism, who were in kind of dilemma of going back to Judaism as they faced the realities of following Jesus. They have embraced the message of salvation, and have discarded the practices of Judaism. As a result they lost popularity; lost friends, and  are contemplating on going back to Judaism.                

4.                     meta. this preposition is not used when the idea of pursuing peace socially is referenced. When pursuing social harmonious relationship is intended, the rabbis use the preposition !yIB; and the Greeks usually use the preposition pro.j especially if it is in the accusative. The author employing the preposition meta. “with” in this passage is in the context of a

collective effort–together. Geoffrey Bromiley, p 114. His audience are to pursue salvation and sanctification together with all in

solidarity.

 

 

 

I. The Jewish converts were admonished to pursue peace and sanctification with all.

               

                A.            Some Christians love being where they are in their spiritual journey.

                               

                B.            They love the company of believers, but they have not let the Spirit of God transform them.

 

                C.            They feel safe and secure, in the body but have never immersed themselves in the things of                                        God.

 

                D.            Those who are stronger and wiser should join hands with the weak in pursuit of salvation                                          and sanctification, without which no one can see the Lord (vs. 14).

TRANSITION: To the author pursuing peace and sanctification is the positive side of seeing to it that, no one falls short of the glory of God; allows a root of bitterness lest it should trouble and defile; acts like Esau by discarding his divine inheritance to satisfy fleshy desire. You think that it’s warning to the Hebrew Christians, but they are for us today. The writer is not talking about

resentment that hinder unity among Christians, by the phrase “root of bitterness”  Read vs. 15.

 

II.        The “root of bitterness” is a person.

 

A.            He is the believer, who when faced by the discipline of the Lord, becomes defiant and in his frustration

                renounces the  faith he has once cherished.

 

B.            He is the arrogant boaster, who raises his fist in the face of God, and could not allow the  discipline of           God to produce fruit of righteousness in his life.

 

C.            He is like the foot with gangrene that needs to be cut off so that it does not contaminate the rest of the         body (vs. 15).

 

D.            He is the high handed sinner, who tramples the blood of covenant under his feet, and rejects blessing that

 

                                                                                                                                                               

5.             “root of bitterness”   The author is quoting  from the larger phrase from the LXX used in Deuteronomy 29:17-18, which provides the thought context for our passage. In Deuteronomy 29, after the revision of the list of the covenant stipulations, and the enumeration of the blessings and curses for keeping and violating the covenant, Moses briefly reminds them of Yahweh’s deliverance from Egypt, and from Sihon and Og, whose land the two and half tribes of Israel- Gadites, Reubenites, and half of Manasseh occupied, and called the assembly in light of these things that Yahweh has done to take the covenant seriously, for only then can they be established in the new land that God promised to Abraham. Moses uses the destruction of the inhabitants of the lands they were to possess to remind Israel that should they not keep the covenant with Yahweh, they will be met with the same fate as the previous inhabitants those lands. The idolatry of the nations whom God has destroyed should serve a deterrent, lest any man or woman should grow haughty toward God and repudiate the covenant; lest such a person become a poisonous root bearing poisonous fruit. Such person is the arrogant boaster who boasts of peace in his rebellion. Intending to destroy the good land in his arrogance. God will single out this person and pour out the curses of the covenant upon this person. God will not be willing to forgive this person. This arrogant boaster is the root of bitterness. The root of bitterness is person. The reader of Heb 21:5 knows  Deuteronomy 29:18 and is being encouraged to persevere during difficult trails and not to go back to the old way of Judaism, for if after they have experienced the goodness of the Lord in their newly found faith, reject the new covenant, by going back to the old way, they  will be like the one who tramples the blood

of the covenant under his feet. This person may not be forgiven. This one is the person who commits the unpardonable sin- the blasphemy of the holy Spirit. The believers are then encouraged not let such person exist in the body by a collective effort to

pursue salvation and sanctification. Numbers 15:30-31 is another OT text that links the root of bitterness to a person. Other NT

 passages that speak of this are Acts 8:9-24; Mark 3:23-30.

The root of bitterness is the high handed sinner, the corrupter is like a leg with gangrene that needs to be cut off. He is an anti-Christ who rejected the saving work of God through His Holy Spirit God has promised to those who persevere. The Holy Spirit does not want anyone numbered among the believers to be this root of bitterness, and so the believers have to look out for one another– get each other’s back

 

TRANSITION: Like Esau, who despised his birthright,  this arrogant boaster, the corrupter, and the reviler may not be forgiven of his apostasy. So the believers ought not to let this believer go down the wrong path. The believers must then strengthen the knees that are disjointed, ensure that no one becomes like immoral Esau, takes for granted the grace of God, and do damage in the body of Christ. We are in this together. No one should be left behind.

 

III.         It seems that these Hebrew recipients are in a kind of dilemma here (vs. 12:4).   

 

                A.            They have suffered persecution for their newly found faith in Christ, and have begun to shrink in                                  their faith.

 

                B.            The author  Hebrews is confident that his readers will not be like those who shrink back after                                          tasting the goodness of the Lord.

               

                C.            He is confident that his readers will persevere and receive their reward.

 

                D.            The Holy Spirit is confident that you and I will hold fast to our confession and not go on sinning;                   and that no one among us becomes root of bitterness.

 

TRANSTITION:  The believers are to press on like the Heroes of the faith, and not be like Esau. They are to pursue  peace and sanctification together with all, making sure that no one acts like Esau, who sold his inheritance for fleshy appetite. The believers are not to let their period of trials cost them their reward. They should not let the fleeting worldly pleasures hinder them the heavenly blessing which awaits those who persevere to the end. We must run as a team. We must look out for each other. Though we run individually, the prize is won by collective effort.

 

Conclusion: 

 

When we look out for each other, we ensure that no root of bitterness exists among us. When we pursue peace with all, we avoid anyone among us being like Esau. When we persevere in times of trial and help those among us who struggle in their walk with God, we ensure that no one falls short of the grace of God. Homiletical Idea: We are in this together and together we will be victorious.

 

Benediction: may God who has called us out of darkness into his marvelous light endue us with the power and boldness to encourage one another so that no one numbered among us will fall short of the grace of God. Amen!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bibliograpgy

 

 

 

Von Rad Gerhard , Vol. II Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, X vols., gen. ed.           Gerhard kittle, trans., Geoffrey Bromiley; (1964 rpt. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1993) pp 405-406.

 

Greek New Testament.

Leave a comment

Filed under Sermons, Social Justice

FOR WHAT SINS DID JESUS DIE?

 

I remember a conversation with the Lord Bishop during my Ordination to Deaconate Orders at the Ordination Retreat a while ago. I had questioned the Lord Bishop the rationale for a Retreat before the Ordination. His response was “Retreat is a must if I am to lay my hands on you so that you don’t trivialize Holy Orders.”

The church often teaches that Jesus is the son of God who died to save us from our sins, but never really does a good job explaining what those sins are. What are those sins one may ask? Maybe the naughty things we do; or the thoughts we think. Maybe staring at  beautiful ladies or handsome men? What about having a swig of booze or two; or not paying our tithes and offering (Robbing God)? What about not going to church; telling whites lies or embellishing our stories? If these are what we make our sins to be, then like the Lord Bishop said, we are trivializing the death of Christ.

Are our sins not the rejection of God as the daily ruler of our lives? Refusal to deeply care and commit to all of God’s children irrespective of their race, sexual orientation, religious affiliation or lack thereof ? Are our sins not protecting our self interests at the expense of others? How about seeking security in wealth and investments and stocks; and ignoring the poor and the needy among us? Are our sins not failing to speak out against injustice and exploitation of the poor? How about our tendency to develop hatred toward a brother or sister in the Lord because they offended you many years ago and you just cannot seem to forgive them? Are our sins not abusing illegal immigrants and paying them little or nothing to work “under the table” year in year out? What about the church building a sanctuary that can sit 50,000 parishioners, and collecting millions from tithes and offering while there are parishioners that are starving. Think about these and tell me what you think.

Your Comments would be appreciated. All comments are welcome!

Jacobs.+

Leave a comment

Filed under Christian Thoughts

A Tribute to my son Levi Nehemiah Jacobs on his Eight Birthday

Image

 

Priest & Cup Bearer: A Tribute to my son Levi Nehemiah Jacobs on his Eight Birthday

Eight years ago I was thinking of a Biblical name for our second son. Having completed over year of Greek and Hebrew then (For those of you know what I am talking about; because you think you‘ve all got it all figured out after one semester of the languages only to find out that maybe not), I came up with names like Melek, Mikael; Melek-zedek etc. My spouse did not buy any of that, she asked “who names their child Zedek?” So during one of my morning devotions, I heard the Spirit of God say to me name him Levi. My devotion that morning had nothing to do with choosing a name for our son. At the end of my devotion that mooring, I informed my spouse (then) that we will name our son Levi and went ahead to explain how I came to that decision.

What Amazed me was that she knew the name she had chosen for our son’s middle name all the time that I was trying to find one. She said “I will name him Nehemiah.” I was not sure of her criteria for choosing the name, but it sounded good to me. Not only did it sound good to me, but I also know that many scholars believe that Nehemiah “the cup bearer” was also a priest from the Tribe of Levi. I thought it was a confirmation from God to name our son Levi. Our son Levi is indeed a priest.

Levi never mentions ten words without referencing God or something Christian related. Sometimes, when I am watching news and he happens to come into the living room, I change the channel if it has inappropriate content for kids. He would say to me, “you are Christian why are you watching bad show?” I will have to explain to him that it is not a bad show, but that I changed channel because it was not appropriate for his age. Levi cannot sleep without the Bible being read and prayer said. Each time I am dropping him and his brother off at the their mother‘s, if I forget to anoint them, he will remind me, and he has to be the first one to anointed.

Nehemiah: From Centralized Faith to Localized Faith

One could argue that Nehemiah was as important to the formation of Judaism in the same fashion that the Prophet Moses was to the creation of the nation of Israel. In the book that bears his name, we learn of how Nehemiah obtained the favor of King Artaxerxes, which enabled him to organize a movement that rebuilt the city of Jerusalem. Not only did Nehemiah obtain the king’s favor to rebuild the city of Jerusalem, he also rebuilt the people’s lives.

After Nehemiah secured the “shalom” of city of Jerusalem, he selected certain division of the Levites and charged them not to conduct worship in Jerusalem but to go to the towns and the villages throughout Israel to teach the Jewish faith there and provide priestly services. The temple became dispersed to the people rather than the people coming to the temple. This is a very remarkable achievement by Nehemiah because up until this time all Jewish worship took place in the temple in Jerusalem with the Levites solely assigned to minister that worship.

Nehemiah’s community organizing skills led to the initiation of the synagogue worship system which in about hundred years became the center of religious instruction, decision making, and maintaining of the ethics of the Israelites. About three hundred years later, the synagogue became as important as the temple as the Jews went to their local synagogues to receive instruction and to worship God no matter where they lived, and their only obligation to Jerusalem was to travel there three times a year to celebrate the feasts of First fruit, Passover, and Booths. This is how localized faith became a centralized institution and it all happened because Nehemiah led a delegation that not only rebuilt the city but also rebuilt the peoples lives. The synagogue became the model that was used by the Christians to form the local Christian Churches. The synagogue became the Church and the Rabi became pastor or priest. The book of the law (Torah) became the Bible. It was the synagogue that formed Judaism into a movement that would eventually give us Jesus. And this happened because Nehemiah was not blindfolded by the comfortable lifestyle and luxury associated with “Susa” (Washington DC maybe?) and did not allow affluence to hinder him from pondering on the plight of his people and the city of Jerusalem. I pray God’s shalom on my beloved son Levi on His eight birthday on November 27, 2013 Amen!

Fr. Jacobs

Leave a comment

Filed under Personal Reflections

Are Christians the most confrontative persons there are?

Christians have traditionally had issues with confrontation. This I think is because we espouse a theology that fosters love toward one another, always thinking of the other person than oneself. Maybe because we view ourselves as brothers and sisters, we feel that confrontation is unchristian but unbeknownst to us that we are avoiding the latent ingredient in confrontation that is part of the constituents of a healthy family. We have to be aware of the differential between confrontation and violence. The two are not the same.

One other reason why Christians are confrontive is that Christians are people of conviction, which makes it easily for us to divide the world into “us” and “them.”
Here is my dilemma in avoiding confrontation: Confrontation when unacknowledged and embedded with our false humility or quasi religious pietism, results in suppressed emotion, which could easily trigger off one’s existing anxious emotional process. This results in confrontive people.

We have to confront when we need to but we must avoid violence at all cost if we want to be followers of Christ. We must learn how to be comfortable with confrontation as Jesus was.
Look at the Gospel of Luke and you will find that majority of the stories about Jesus were confrontational. He was in one occasion violent (I mean he got physical). Can you believe that? Remember we are talking about the meek and gentle Jesus.

This is not a call to confront a fellow Christian over sitting on your favorite pew on a Sunday morning service, or drinking the last cup coffee during church breakfast without replacing a new one. This confrontation is about speaking up against injustice, exploitation of the poor and powerless. It is about confronting our political leaders and holding them accountable for their failure to defend the cause of the weak. It’s about holding religious leaders accountable for their failure to reflect what they teach and preach; when they live ostentatious life styles while there are poor people around us. Some of these religious leaders have more than two private jets while there are single parents in their churches who cannot afford to feed their two year old children because they have tithed their last penny in faith to the church. They preach and encourage the congregation to live by faith, while they themselves live in surfeit of luxury. What would Jesus do? We are confrontive over trivial issues but refuse to engage in the real issues facing the church. What shall we do?

2 Comments

Filed under Christian Thoughts

HOW SHOULD WE APPROACH SCRIPTURE?

Since the Bible/Scripture is required text for Christianity, Christians have approached its study and interpretation in different ways. This varied approach to Biblical interpretation has led to divergence in opinion on how it should be applied, and has resulted in misleading doctrines across denominational labels. To add to this problem is the fact that the Scripture came to us in different languages: Hebrew and Greek, which we now read in the English language. The task remains for pastor’s, teachers and readers to figure out what method of interpretation to adopt. It could be argued that much part of twentieth century, have witnessed two predominant approaches to studying the scriptures.

The first one seeks to discern the sources of the scripture in order to produce a definite text from which we articulate the Christian faith. This method could be attributed to the Enlightenment period, which focused mostly on rational and logic. During this period the instruments that biblical scholars utilized to prove scriptures were: Form Criticism; Redaction Criticism; and Historical Criticism.

Form Criticism sought to decipher the accuracy of the specific text.
Redaction Criticism was concerned with how specific biblical passages were put together, including its editorial relationship to what it is today. Historical Criticism sought to understand the original document upon which the Scripture is based and not upon Moses. This resulted into what is known as “Documentary Hypothesis” that suggests that Pentateuch was complied from four documents: JEDP.

The second one has to do with understanding the discourse of the message contained in the scripture. This includes approaching the scripture from the perspective of listening to how it spoke to it’s earlier recipients.

One thing remains true: our view of how the Bible came into being (inspiration) influences how we interpret and apply it. Some of my colleagues wished that the Old Testament was never part of the Scripture because their God, who is an embodiment of love cannot authorize wars and slaying of nations He made. Others believe that there is no judgment of the wicked because love is all there is. To them the Book of Revelation is irrelevant.  Love your neighbor as yourself they say.

My choice of mode of interpretation and understanding of Scripture is to allow the scripture to read us. This means 1.) we must decipher to whom that particular text was written; 2.) understand the major events and movements occurring at the time of writing. For example, if the writer was writing during this recent political impasse that almost put our nation in the brink of disaster, would the message reflect this event? 3.) and to ask the question: what is the text saying to us today?

What method of interpretation do you prefer and why? Or How do you read the Bible? Please elaborate.

God’s Best Wishes!
Fr. Jacobs

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Christian Thoughts

Father Jacobs

Leave a comment

October 15, 2013 · 3:07 am

Father Blessing and Big Blessing and Ven. Bruce

Father Blessing and Big Blessing and Ven. Bruce

Leave a comment

October 15, 2013 · 3:01 am

LEVI AND FR. BLESSING

LEVI AND FR. BLESSING

Leave a comment

October 15, 2013 · 2:59 am

Ordination 9/29/2013

Ordination

Leave a comment

October 15, 2013 · 2:37 am

In God’s Economy, those who lead are called to serve

I have had checkered careers in my life. I was once into construction business. At one point I was one of the lead masons that constructed the Malabo Bridge in Guinea Equatorial, Central Africa in 1999 before I resigned as a supervisor in June of that year in preparation for my migration to the US. As a mason, one of the tools that we used frequently was the hammer. We used it to drive nails into objects. As we drove nails into woods or other targets we would inadvertently hit the hammer on our fingers. Man, did it hurt!  I also bite my tongue accidentally sometimes and I am sure that some of you do. What amazed me is that in these two scenarios, I never tried to strike my other arm that hit my fingers or strike my teeth with the hammer to get even as we would normally do when someone hits us. In  Ephesians 5:22-25, Paul portrays marriage like Christ and the Church. He talks about how the husband is the head of the wife in the same manner that Christ is the head of the Church. He gives the injunction that wives ought to be subject to their husbands. He also commands the husbands to love their wives in the same manner that Christ loved the Church and gave Himself up for her.  I have listened to many women that are angered by this passage especially the part that has to do with “submission to husbands.” All of the women that came to speak with me about this passage left very satisfied though leaving me with fear of the aftermath effect when they get home to their husbands (I say this with tongue in cheek). Going back to my construction story: The reason why I did not hit the arm that struck my fingers while I was driving the nail into a target or hit my teeth with a hammer to get even is because it would hurt even more. It would hurt because It’s my body. Marriage is one flesh bond. When couples get married, they become one flesh. They cleave together. The Hebrew word used in Genesis in description of marriage of Adam and his wife Eve is that of welding of two irons together. The man and the woman are welded together and any attempt to separate will be very painful.  They become one body.  My not striking my teeth or my arm with the hammer to get even applies to husbands and wives. When they get into fights; become abusive to each other; or even divorce; it is like striking your teeth with a hammer when you accidentally bite your tongue or striking your arm with a hammer to get even when you inadvertently hit your fingers with a hammer. Husbands, your job is to love your wives the same way that Christ loves the church and gave himself up for her. It is not conditional. If you do this you will never have to worry about your wives loving you (unless you are dealing with a wife that is allergic to being loved; we live in a fallen world). Husbands are to serve their wives, just as Jesus served his disciples. In God’s economy, those who are called to lead are called to be servants. More on this.           

3 Comments

Filed under Christian Thoughts