Tag Archives: jesus

From Manger to Mystery: A Cosmic Christmas Reflection

A couple of weeks ago, I preached from the opening chapter of John’s Gospel, and the message has stayed with me. I felt led to share it with you.

Christmas first draws us to the manger, a scene small, tender, and beautifully human. We picture a young mother, a watchful father, a feeding trough, and a newborn wrapped in cloth. It is intimate and earthy, close enough to touch. But John’s Gospel will not let us remain in that small circle of light. He pulls the lens back, until Bethlehem becomes a single point in a story as vast as the universe.

John begins not with shepherds or angels, but with eternity itself:
“In the beginning was the Word…”

Before atoms, before galaxies, before time began, the Word already was. The child in the manger is the One through whom the cosmos came into being. The tiny hands that grasped Mary’s finger are the same hands that set the stars in their courses.

This is the cosmic shock of Christmas:
The Creator enters creation.
The Infinite becomes an infant.
The Eternal steps into time.

The manger is not the beginning of Jesus’ story. It is the moment the eternal Word crosses the threshold into our world. The One who sustains all things with divine breath chooses to breathe our air, bear our limitations, and walk our soil. Christmas is not simply a birth; it is a cosmic descent, a divine self‑giving that stretches from eternity into human history.

And John tells us the reason:
“The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it.”

The Incarnation is God’s cosmic answer to the darkness that touches every corner of human life. Not a distant rescue, but a presence. Not a message from afar, but God with us. The Word becomes flesh so that divine light can enter every shadow, our fear, our confusion, our longing.

From manger to mystery, Christmas expands.
It begins in a stable, but it reaches into the heart of the universe.
It starts with a baby, but it reveals the God who holds all things together.
It looks small, but it is nothing less than a cosmic intervention.

So, when we look at the manger, we are not simply looking at a birth.
We are seeing the mystery of the universe bending low.
We are seeing the eternal Word choosing to dwell among us.
We are seeing the Light that no darkness can overcome.

Christmas is intimate, yet infinite.
Tender, yet transcendent.
A manger, and a mystery.

And that mystery is still unfolding in us today.

Please comment with your fee

Please comment with your feedback.

Shalom.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Trump and Cyrus the Great: A Modern Analogy in Religious and Political Thought

Historical Context of the Comparison

In 2018, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised President Donald Trump for his recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. In doing so, he drew a striking parallel between Trump and three figures remembered for their pivotal support of Jewish restoration: King Cyrus of Persia, Lord Arthur Balfour, and President Harry Truman. Each of these leaders, though not Jewish themselves, is remembered for decisive actions that advanced Jewish sovereignty and restoration.

Most recently, during Trump’s address to the Knesset following a ceasefire agreement with Hamas and the return of hostages, Netanyahu reiterated the Trump and Cyrus analogy. This raises the question: what exactly is the Prime Minister referring to?

The Basis of the Analogy

The comparison rests on the idea that both Cyrus and Trump acted as outsiders who nonetheless played decisive roles in advancing Jewish restoration and sovereignty in Jerusalem. Cyrus authorized the rebuilding of the Temple after the Babylonian exile; Trump affirmed Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. In both Jewish and Christian thought, these leaders are remembered as instruments of divine purpose, despite their personal imperfections.

Evangelical Interpretation of Cyrus

The analogy gains further depth when viewed through the lens of evangelical theology. In Isaiah 45, Cyrus is described as God’s “anointed” (messiah in Hebrew), even though he was a pagan king. Evangelicals emphasize that God can use unlikely or imperfect leaders to fulfill divine purposes.

Many evangelicals argued that, like Cyrus, Trump was not a model of personal holiness but was nonetheless chosen to advance God’s plan, particularly regarding Israel and religious freedom. This raises an important theological nuance: holiness, in ANE and Old Testament understanding, is not merely a matter of purity or morality. Holiness is ontological. For example, to the pagans and idol worshippers, the gods were considered holy because they were believed to exist beyond this realm. In Christian theology, only God is truly holy, and human holiness derives from reflecting the holiness of God.

Against this backdrop, Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem in 2017 was interpreted as a prophetic act, echoing Cyrus’s decree to rebuild the Temple. Evangelical leaders framed this decision as aligning with biblical prophecy and eschatological expectation.

Instrumentality Over Morality

The key takeaway in evangelical theology is that the Cyrus and Trump parallel is not about personal virtue but about divine instrumentality. The analogy underscores two central themes:

  • Instrumentality over morality: God uses leaders for His purposes regardless of their flaws.
  • Prophetic fulfillment: Trump’s actions are often connected to eschatological expectations, with the restoration of Israel seen as a step toward end-times prophecy.

For many evangelicals, this analogy became a theological justification for supporting Trump, portraying him as divinely appointed despite controversies. It helped solidify his backing among evangelical communities, who viewed him as a vessel for God’s plan.

Critiques and Cautions

Not all observers embraced this interpretation. Some theologians and commentators cautioned that the analogy risked politicizing biblical prophecy, turning scripture into a tool for partisan endorsement. Critics argued that such comparisons blur the line between theological reflection and political expediency, potentially undermining the integrity of both.

Conclusion

The Trump–Cyrus analogy illustrates how religious narratives can shape political discourse and mobilize support. For evangelicals, it reinforced the belief that God works through unexpected leaders to accomplish divine purposes. For critics, it raised concerns about the politicization of sacred texts. Ultimately, the analogy reflects the enduring power of biblical imagery to frame contemporary events considering ancient precedent.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized